Reconstructing al-Dakhīl fī al-Tafsīr as Epistemic Quality Control: Integrating the Epistemic Filter and Interpretive Horizon
Abstract
Contemporary Qur’anic interpretation faces two interrelated methodological challenges: maintaining the epistemic validity of interpretive claims and ensuring their relevance to continuously changing contexts. This article aims to reconstruct al-Dakhīl fī al-Tafsīr from a critical concept primarily concerned with identifying infiltrative elements into an epistemic quality control framework and to functionally integrate it with hermeneutics and Qur’anic contextualism. This study employs qualitative library research using a critical-comparative approach and conceptual synthesis. Primary sources comprise seminal works representing al-Dakhīl fī al-Tafsīr, hermeneutics, and Qur’anic contextualism, while secondary sources include scholarly journal articles, academic books, and relevant studies, with priority given to publications from 2022–2026. Data were collected through documentation and bibliographic searches based on the criteria of relevance, bibliographic traceability, academic authority, and evidentiary contribution. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis within a critical-comparative framework, followed by conceptual synthesis through six stages: concept identification, genealogical mapping, reconstruction of epistemological assumptions, comparison of methodological functions, evaluation of strengths and limitations, and conceptual synthesis. The findings demonstrate that al-Dakhīl fī al-Tafsīr can be reconstructed as an epistemic quality-control mechanism through source authentication, linguistic validation, and methodological validation, while hermeneutics and Qur’anic contextualism contribute to historical reconstruction, the extraction of significance, and contemporary recontextualization. Their functional integration generates the Filter–Horizon Model, a sequential but recursive framework that positions epistemic admissibility as a prerequisite for contextual productivity. The model offers a conceptual contribution by establishing a functional division between the epistemic filter and the interpretive horizon, thereby enabling Qur’anic interpretation to remain epistemically accountable and contextually responsive without collapsing the epistemological distinctions among the intellectual traditions brought into dialogue.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abrori, Aqil Ahmad Sahal Aqil, dan Meirando Rukhuz. “Fenomena Al-Dakhil dalam Tafsir Lughawi: Menelisik Kajian Linguistik dalam Tafsir Al-Kashaf Karya Al-Zamakhshari.” Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam 5, no. 3 (2024): 594–610. https://doi.org/10.58401/takwiluna.v5i3.1796.
Adawy, Abdillah Amiril, dan Zaky Muhammad Aqil. “Implikasi al-Dakhīl dalam Tafsir: Telaah Kisah Nabi Ayub dalam Al-Kashf wa al-Bayān ‘an Tafsīr al-Qur’ān.” Canonia Religia 2, no. 1 (2024): 73–86. https://doi.org/10.30762/cr.v2i1.2869.
Al-Janabi, Mahdi Kais Abdulkarim. “Artificial Intelligence in Quranic Exegesis: A Critical Analytical Study of ChatGPT Technology.” International Journal of Quranic Research 16, no. 2 (2024): 112–44. https://doi.org/10.22452/quranica.vol16no2.5.
Amirotussolihah, A., A. M. Ismatulloh S. F. Muslihah, dan A. F. Rozi. “Larangan Hate Comment di Media Sosial: Kontekstualisasi Q.S. An-Nisa’: 148 (Tinjauan Analisis Ma’na-Cum-Maghza).” Islamika: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 22, no. 1 (2022): 114–29. https://doi.org/10.32939/islamika.v22i01.1143.
Andrean, Muhammad, dan Mardian Idris Harahap. “Artificial Intelligence and Qur’anic Interpretation: A Critical Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Classical Tafsir.” Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 4, no. 2 (2025): 658–70. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v4i2.641.
Anjeli, Sulistiana Suyatmi dan Eka Prasetiawati. “Criticism of Audiovisual Interpretation: Ad-Dakhîl Fit-Tafsîr in the Interpretation of Husain Basyaiban.” Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu al-Quran dan Tafsir 4, no. 1 (2024): 67–86. https://doi.org/10.19109/jsq.v4i1.22143.
Azhar, Muhammad Hazim Mohd, Khadher Ahmad Mohamad Fikri Mohd Bakri, dan Muhammad Ikhlas Rosele. “Ethics and Limits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Quranic Exegesis According to the Epistemological Framework of Islamic Knowledge.” QURANICA: International Journal of Quranic Research 17, no. 2 (2025): 97–124. https://doi.org/10.22452/quranica.vol17no2.5.
Aziz, Azalia Wardha. “Al-Dakhil dalam Tafsir al-Kasysyaf Karya Al-Zamakhsyari.” MAGHZA: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 8, no. 1 (2023): 29–49. https://doi.org/10.24090/maghza.v8i1.6675.
Azizah, Shofiyana. “al-dākhil al-Naqly dalam Tafsir Ma’ālim al-Tanzīl Karya al-Baghawī: Analisis terhadap Surah Maryam.” Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu al-Quran dan Tafsir 5, no. 1 (2025): 409–29. https://doi.org/10.19109/jsq.v5i1.27510.
Budiman, S., A. Muhtarom W. Wahyudin, dan A. Sufyan. “Metodologi Penafsiran Kontekstual Abdullah Saeed dalam Al-Qur’an Abad 21.” Journal of Education Research 5, no. 1 (2024): 821–30. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i1.836.
Dozan, Wely dan Lalu Masaji. “Reformulasi Tafsir Al-Qur’an di Era Modern: Telaah Historis Dinamika dan Transformasi Metodologi Interpretasi.” al-Afkar: Journal for Islamic Studies 5, no. 1 (2022): 424–37. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v5i1.247.
Fauzi, Duea Amalia, Ainuki Astna Asysyifa, dan Muhammad Mundzir. “The Hermeneutical Dimension of Quraish Shihab’s Interpretation of the Aurat Verses in the Qur’an.” HERMENEUTIK 17, no. 1 (2023): 43. https://doi.org/10.21043/hermeneutik.v17i1.13777.
Fāyid, ‘Abd al-Wahhāb. Al-Dakhīl fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-Karīm. Maṭba‘at Ḥassān, 1978, 1978.
Firdaus, Muhamad Yoga, dan Khader Ahmad. “Telaah atas Hermeneutika Kontekstual Abdullah Saeed.” Mashadiruna Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 3, no. 1 (2024): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.15575/mjiat.v3i1.34045.
Firdaus, Muhamad Yoga, dan Khader Ahmad. “Telaah atas Hermeneutika Kontekstual Abdullah Saeed.” Mashadiruna Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 3, no. 1 (2024): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.15575/mjiat.v3i1.34045.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Revised ed. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. Bloomsbury Academic, 2013, 2013.
Hakim, Lukman. “Identifikasi dan Analisis Al-Dakhil dalam Qira’at.” Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 9, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.30868/at.v9i01.6616.
Hatta, Muhammad. “Abdullah Saeed’s Contextual Restructures of The Qur’an.” International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities 2, no. 1 (2023): 47–55. https://doi.org/10.54298/ijith.v2i1.56.
Ichwan, Moh. Nor, dan Auwal Salisu. “Reevaluating Qur’anic Hermeneutics: A Comparative Analysis Between Classical Tafsir and Modern Hermeneutical Approaches.” Kalam 18, no. 2 (2024): 107–26. https://doi.org/10.24042/kalam.v18i2.24213.
Mohd Azhar, Muhammad Hazim, Mohamad Fikri Mohd Bakri, Khadher Ahmad, dan Muhammad Ikhlas Rosele. “Ethics and Limits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Quranic Exegesis According to the Epistemological Framework of Islamic Knowledge.” International Journal of Quranic Research 17, no. 2 (2025): 97–124. https://doi.org/10.22452/quranica.vol17no2.5.
Muhamad Nur. “Hermeneutika Kontekstual Abdullah Saeed Dan Aplikasinya Dalam Relasi Gender.” Halaqah: Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies 1, no. 2 (2024): 223–48. https://doi.org/10.62509/hjis.v1i2.150.
Muhammad, Hafid Nur. “Analisis Metode Hermeneutika dalam Al-Qur’an atas Pemikiran Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid.” Ulumul Qur’an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 2, no. 1 (2022): 49–57. https://doi.org/10.58404/uq.v2i1.93.
Muhyin, Nabila Fajriyanti. “The Concepts Of Contextual Interpretation Of The Qur’an Abdullah Saeed.” Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran 6, no. 1 (2023): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.20871/tjsq.v6i1.289.
Mukarromah, Arofatul dan Rima Syahiroh. “Distortion of Meaning in Interpretation: A Study of Al-Dakhil in the Rules of Lafaz.” Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 4, no. 2 (2025): 470–80. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v4i2.547.
Nisa, F., A. F. Rozi I. Imamah, dan M. S. Mabrur. “Sex Education Perspektif Al-Qur’an: Tinjauan Hermeneutis Ma’na Cum Maghza QS. An-Nur: 30–31.” Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan al-Hadis 10, no. 1 (2022): 92–114. https://doi.org/10.24235/diyaafkar.v10i1.9999.
Nur, Muhamad. “Hermeneutika Kontekstual Abdullah Saeed dan Aplikasinya dalam Relasi Gender.” Halaqah: Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies 1, no. 2 (2024): 223–48. https://doi.org/10.62509/hjis.v1i2.150.
Nur Muhammad, Hafid, dan Tedi Turmudzi, Dkk. “Analisis Metode Hermeneutika dalam Al-Qur’an atas Pemikiran Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid.” Ulumul Qur’an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 2, no. 1 (2022): 49–57. https://doi.org/10.58404/uq.v2i1.93.
Putra, A. E. dan L. S. Masyhur. “Hermeneutika dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an: Analisis Metode Tafsir Muhammad Arkoun.” Jurnal Tafsere 13, no. 1 (2025): 73–98. https://doi.org/10.24252/jt.v13i1.57461.
Qomariyah, Qomariyah, dan Ilyas Ilyas. “Pemahaman al-Dākhil dalam Tafsir Saintifik: Sebuah Tinjauan Umum.” Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu al-Quran dan Tafsir 3, no. 2 (2023): 387–99. https://doi.org/10.19109/jsq.v3i2.26738.
Rahman, Fazlur. Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. University of Chicago Press, 1982, 1982.
Ricoeur, Paul. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Edited and translated by John B. Thompson. Cambridge University Press, 2016, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316534984.
Rozy, Yahya Fathur. “The Hermeneutics Influence on Feminist Exegesis: A Case Study on Amina Wadud.” QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies 2, no. 3 (2023): 369–81. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v2i3.2908.
Saeed, Abdullah. Reading the Qur’an in the Twenty-First Century: A Contextualist Approach. Routledge, 2014, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870922.
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Friedrich Schleiermacher Hermeneutics and Criticism: And Other Writings. 1 ed. Disunting oleh Andrew Bowie. Cambridge University Press, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814945.
Shofiyana Azizah. “al-dākhil al-Naqly dalam Tafsir Ma’ālim al-Tanzīl Karya al-Baghawī: Analisis terhadap Surah Maryam.” Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu al-Quran dan Tafsir 5, no. 1 (2025): 409–29. https://doi.org/10.19109/jsq.v5i1.27510.
Shomad, Abdus. “Otoritas Laki-Laki Dan Perempuan: Studi Penafsiran Kontekstual Abdullah Saeed terhadap Qs. an-Nisa 4: 34.” Jurnal AlifLam: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities 3, no. 1 (2022): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.51700/aliflam.v3i1.432.
Sulistiana Suyatmi Anjeli, Muhammad Irsad, dan Eka Prasetiawati. “Criticism of Audiovisual Interpretation: Ad-Dakhîl Fit-Tafsîr in the Interpretation of Husain Basyaiban.” Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu al-Quran dan Tafsir 4, no. 1 (2024): 67–86. https://doi.org/10.19109/jsq.v4i1.22143.
Syauqi, Muhammad Labib. “Hermeneutika Double Movement Fazlur Rahman dan Signifikansinya terhadap Penafsiran Kontekstual Al-Qur’an.” Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Ilmu Studi Ushuluddin dan Filsafat 18, no. 2 (2022): 189–215. https://doi.org/10.24239/rsy.v18i2.977.
Ulum, Bahrul, dan Alwi Alatas. “Kritik Metode Hermeneutika pada Al-Qur’an: Sebuah Refleksi.” EL-BANAT: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam 12, no. 2 (2022): 179–97. https://doi.org/10.54180/elbanat.2022.12.2.179-197.
Yahya, M. S. dan Z. Ni’mah. “Religious Moderation with the Concept of Ummatan Wasathan: Tafsir Al-Qur’an Surah al-Baqarah Verse 143 through Ma’na Cum Maghza.” Al-Fikru: Jurnal Ilmiah 16, no. 2 (2022): 326–35. https://doi.org/10.51672/alfikru.v16i2.158.
Zahrani, Hani dan Rubini. “Pendekatan Hermeneutika dalam Pengkajian Islam.” SALIHA: Jurnal Pendidikan & Agama Islam 6, no. 2 (2023): 171–96. https://doi.org/10.54396/saliha.v6i2.662.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i5.21223
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.









Editorial Office Board :
Kampus UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan
Jl. T Rizal Nurdin No.Km 4, RW.5, Sihitang, Padangsidimpuan Tenggara, Kota Padang Sidempuan, Sumatera Utara 22733
Jurnal El-Thawalib is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats




