CATFISHING DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA

Atika Zahra Nirmala (Universitas Mataram, Indonesia)
Ayu Riska Amalia (Universitas Mataram, Indonesia)
Nunung Rahmania (Universitas Mataram, Indonesia)
Zahratul’ain Taufik (Universitas Mataram, Indonesia)

Abstract


This study aims to analyze catfishing in the perspective of Indonesian positive law. This research is a type of normative juridical research with statutory and case approach methods and then uses descriptive qualitative analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that catfishing is one of the crimes that use technology by utilizing social media where catfishing which is a form of fraud in cyberspace with its modus operandi using a fake identity then showing interest in other people so as to form an emotional or romantic relationship, and then using the victim to benefit himself by giving something in the form of goods or money. Therefore, based on Indonesian positive law the act above is a crime which fulfills the elements in Article 378 of the Criminal Code and Article 35 in conjunction with Article 51 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law. With the existence of these rules can accommodate the crime of catfishing and the catfish although there is no cyberlaw that specifically regulates crimes such as catfishing.

Keywords


catfishing; cybercrime; positive law

Full Text:

PDF

References


BUKU:

Chazawi, Adami, and Ardi Ferdian. 2015. “Tindak Pidana Informasi & Transaksi Elektronik Penyerangan Terhadap Kepentingan Hukum Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik.” In Media Nusa Creative.

Gunadi, Ismu, and Jonaedi Efendy. 2015. “Cepat & Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana.” In Kencana Predana Media Group.

Wahid, Abdul, and Mohammad Labib. 2005. “Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime).” In PT. Refika Aditama, Jakarta, 103. PT. Refika Aditama.

ARTIKEL JURNAL:

Agustian, Rio Armanda, and Jeanne Darc Noviayanti Manik. 2021. “Tindak Pidana Informasi Elektronik Dalam Kerangka Hukum Positif.” PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum 16 (1): 92–111. https://doi.org/10.33019/progresif.v16i1.2236.

Angkupi, Prima. 2014. “Kejahatan Melalui Media Sosial Elektronik Di Indonesia Bedasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Saat Ini.” Jurnal Mikrotik 2 (1): 1–8.

Arradian, Danang. 2022. “Mengenal Fenomena Catfishing, Penipuan Dengan Identitas Palsu.” Https://Tekno.Sindonews.Com/Read/706787/207/Mengenal-Fenomena-Catfishing-Penipuan-Dengan-Identitas-Palsu-1646744605?Showpage=all. 2022.

Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhammad Azhar. 2020. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan 7 (1): 20–33.

Cohen, Mandi. 2019. “Angling for Justice: Using Federal Law to Reel in Catfishing.” Journal of Law and Technology at Texas 2: 57.

Eka, Citra, and Radja Erland Hamzah. 2022. “Analisis Fenomena Penipuan Identitas Diri (Catfishing) Pada Literasi Digital Pengguna Media Sosial.” Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi 3 (2): 68.

Gani, Alcianno G. 2014. “Cybercrime (Kejahatan Berbasis Komputer).” Jurnal Sistem Informasi Universitas Suryadarma 5 (1): 16–29. https://doi.org/10.35968/jsi.v5i1.18.

Gunawan, Hendra. 2020. “Tindak Kejahatan Cyber Crime Dalam Perspektif Fikih Jinayah.” Jurnal El-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Pranata Sosial 6 (1): 96–110. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qanuniy.v6i1.2473.

Hendrik S., Anton. 2019. “Modus Operandi Dan Problematika Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Daring.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 31 (1): 59. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.34786.

HG.org. n.d. “Catfishing - Is It Considered Criminal Fraud?” Https://Www.Hg.Org/Legal-Articles/Catfishing-Is-It-Considered-Criminal-Fraud-48440.

Kamaliah, Aisyah. 2022. “4 Kasus Penipuan Kencan Online, Wanita Indonesia Kena Rp 15,8 M!” Https://Inet.Detik.Com/Cyberlife/d-5940422/4-Kasus-Penipuan-Kencan-Online-Wanita-Indonesia-Kena-Rp-158-M. 2022.

Kottemann, Kathrin L. 2015. “The Rhetoric of Deliberate Deception: What Catfishing Can Teach Us.” University of Louisiana at Lafayette.

Magdalena, Merry, and Maswigrantoro Roes Setyadi. 2007. “Cyberlaw Tidak Perlu Takut.” In Andi.

Media, Merriam-webster. (n.d.). Social. 2023. “In Merriam-Webster.Com Dictionary.” Https://Www.Merriam-Webster.Com/Dictionary/Social%20media. 2023.

Nababan, Asido Selamat Mukidi Marlina. 2022. “PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN DENGAN MODUS INVESTASI.” Jurnal Ilmiah Metadata 4 (2): 189–210.

Nugraha, Riko. 2021. “Perspektif Hukum Indonesia (Cyberlaw) Penanganan Kasus Cyber Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 11 (2): 44–56.

Rahmanto, Tony Yuri. 2019. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Berbasis Transaksi Elektronik.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19 (1): 31. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.v19.31-52.

Richard Sanjaya, Rex, and Weppy Susetiyo. 2020. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penipuan (Studi Kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor 482/Pid.B/2018/PN Blt).” Jurnal Supremasi 10 (1): 55–61. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v10i1.941.

Sitompul, Joshua. 2012. “Cyberspace, Cybercrime, Cyberlaw, Tinjauan Aspek Hukum Pidana.” In PT. Tatanusa, 38.

Thukral, Pankhuri, and Vanshika Kainya. 2022. “How Social Media Influence Crimes.” Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, no. May: 0–11. https://www.ijlmh.com/wp-content/uploads/Influence-of-.

Tirtayasa, Yusuf. 2022. “Waspada Penipuan Akun Palsu Di Media Sosial.” Https://Akurat.Co/Waspada-Penipuan-Akun-Palsu-Di-Media-Sosial-1687542. 2022.

Umejiaku, and Uzoka. 2021. “An Overview of Social Media Related Cybercrimes and Its Legal Remedy*.” Law and Social Justice Review (LASJURE) 2 (2): 50–55.

Watie, Errika Dwi Setya. 2016. “Komunikasi Dan Media Sosial (Communications and Social Media).” Jurnal The Messenger 3 (2): 69. https://doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v3i2.270.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qanuniy.v9i1.7731

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal el-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexing Jurnal :

image hostimage host

image host