Analysis of Variations in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution System

Aulia Nurhikmah(1), Farid Madani(2*), Ahmad Hasan Ridwan(3), Hasan Bisri(4)

(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
(2) Universitas Logistik dan Bisnis Internasinal Bandung
(3) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
(4) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research aims to examine in depth these normative foundations and their implications for the practice of sharia economic dispute resolution in Indonesia. The success of the development of a national Islamic financial system is highly dependent on the effectiveness of dispute resolution mechanisms, so it is important to examine how Islamic law and positive law offer different but complementary approaches. This study uses a qualitative method with a literature study approach to explore developing dispute resolution models. The findings of the study show that in the perspective of Islamic law, the settlement of sharia economic disputes can be carried out through two main models: through judicial authority (qaḍā') and outside the judiciary (taḥkīm or ṣulḥ). Meanwhile, within Indonesia's positive legal framework, there are two main approaches, namely: (1) dispute resolution through litigation processes in judicial institutions, and (2) dispute resolution through non-litigation mechanisms outside of court, such as mediation, arbitration, or other forms of ADR. This study confirms that the diversity of dispute resolution models provides flexibility as well as challenges in efforts to realize justice and legal certainty in sharia economic practices in Indonesia.

Keywords


Litigation; Non-Litigation; Sharia Economics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Aziz, A. Z. Perspective of Arbitrase Institutions to the Shut of Sharia Business (Ash-Shulh Wa Tahkim). 2019. http://repository.syekhnurjati.ac.id/3325/.

Abdullah, Fadli Daud, Doli Witro, Misbahul Munir Makka, Muhamad Sadi Is, and Syahid Mujahid Wiwaha. “Contemporary Challenges for Sharia Financial Institutions to Increase Competitiveness and Product Innovation Perspective of Sharia Economic Law: Evidence in Indonesia.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 3, no. 2 (2024): 141–73.

Al-Mohannadi, Aljazi Majid MA. “Mediation as a Peaceful Means of Conflict Resolution: The Experience of the State of Qatar.” Master’s Thesis, Hamad Bin Khalifa University (Qatar), 2024. https://search.proquest.com.

Ameen, Saad, Tansif Ur Rehman, and Furqan Ansari. “RECONCILING LAW AND FAITH: REGULATORY HURDLES IN PAKISTAN’S ISLAMIC BANKING FRAMEWORK.” Journal of Media Horizons 6, no. 3 (2025): 86–98.

Amir, Amri, Junaidi Junaidi, and Yulmardi Yulmardi. “Buku: Metodologi Penelitian Ekonomi Dan Penerapannya.” Ipb Press, 2009.

Arifuddin, Qadriani, Riswan Riswan, Muhammad Adam HR, et al. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2025. https://books.google.com.

Arpangi, Arpangi, Maydika Ramadani, and Cindy Yosiana. “Optimizing Penal Mediation through Restorative Justice: A Progressive Solution in Criminal Law Reform.” Journal of Justice Dialectical 2, no. 2 (2024): 84–97.

Arslan, Fatma N. “The Many Faces of Court-Connected Non-Adjudicative ADR in Civil and Commercial Cases: A Comparative Study Across England and Wales, Ontario, Italy, and Turkey.” PhD Thesis, University of Leicester, 2024. https://figshare.le.ac.uk.

Creswell, John W., and Cheryl N. Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Sage publications, 2016. https://books.google.com.

Duger, Chloe J. “AI: Increasing Alternatives in Alternative Dispute Resolution Resolved: Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution.” Resolved: J. Alternative Disp. Resol. 12 (2024): 21.

Faizi, Faizi, Ade Nur Rohim Rohim, Mhd Handika Surbakti Surbakti, Misbahul Munir, and Umi Qulsum Qulsum. “Ensuring Shariah Compliance in the Fintech: A Comprehensive Analysis from Indonesia.” Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2025, 1–31.

Fatima, Rubab. Role of Shariah in Islamic Banking Regulation. 2025. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5265634.

King, Martin. “3 An Emerging Conceptual Model Comparing the Deliberative Nature of Online Deliberation Platforms.” Public Deliberation in the Digital Age: Platforms, Participation, and Legitimacy, Taylor & Francis, 2025. https://books.google.com.

Kirazli, Harris Sadik. Conflict Resolution and Peacemaking in Islam: Theory and Practice. Palgrave Series in Islamic Theology, Law, and History. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53927-5.

Klabbers, Jan. “Disagreement Reduced to Writing: Rethinking the Law of Treaties.” Academie de Droit International de La Haye. Recueil Des Cours, no. 447 (2025): 25–185.

Kour, Bhavneet, and Aditya Thakur. Special Issue “Crime, Justice & Society”, August 15, 2024. n.d. Accessed December 6, 2025. https://thedaak.in/2024/08/15/special-issue-crime-justice-society-august-15-2024/.

Kramer, Larry. “Choice of Law in Complex Litigation.” NYUL Rev. 71 (1996): 547.

Neonbeni, Randy Vallentino, Noorhidayah Noorhidayah, I. Made Kariyasa, Andi Khaedhir Kamri, Seno Lamsir, and Naufal Naufal. “Arbitration in Theory and Practice: Challenges in Implementing Arbitration in Tulungagung Regency.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren 7, no. 1 (2025): 71–84.

Rahman, Arief, and Irma Irayanti. “The Pancasila Deliberation Model: A Framework for Fostering Democratic Citizenship in Civic Education.” Entita: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial 7, no. 1 (2025): 41–58.

Rokhmad, Abu. “Islamic Legal Paradigm on Dispute Settlement.” International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 8, no. 8 (2017): 1060–67.

Serrano, Delfina. “Bringing Arbitration (Taḥkīm) and Conciliation (Ṣulḥ) under the Qāḍī’s Purview in Mālikī al-Andalus (10th to 12th Centuries CE).” Revue Des Mondes Musulmans et de La Méditerranée, no. 140 (2016): vol–140.

Shen, Kuan-Ling. Labour Proceedings in the Judicial System: A Comparative Analysis. 2024. https://www.cplj.org/publications/12-4-labour-proceedings-in-the-judicial-system-a-comparative-analysis.

Sherman, Naser, and Bashar Talal Momani. “Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mediation as a Model.” F1000Research 13 (2025): 778.

Syafitri, Isdiana, Tan Kamello, and Hasim Purba. “Contemporary Legal Certainty in Insurance Default Claims: A Comparative Study of Islamic and Positive Law Perspectives.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 1 (2025): 539–65.

Utama, Mohamad Sofyan, and M. Zaidan Mubarok. “Integrating the Concept of Unity in Diversity and Quranic Values in Multicultural Education to Foster Tolerance-Based Character in Indonesia.” Social Studies in Education 2, no. 1 (2024): 45–58.

Widjaja, Gunawan. “Dispute Resolution in Islamic Economic Transactions: The Role and Function of Sharia Arbitration.” Journal of Islamic Economic Laws 8, no. 01 (2025): 60–78.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/multidisipliner.v12i2.16779

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Aulia Nurhikmah, Farid Madani, Ahmad Hasan Ridwan, Hasan Bisri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Web Analytics View My Stats

Editorial Office:

Pascasarjana UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan; 

Jl. T. Rizal Nurdin Km. 4,5 Sihitang 22733 Padangsidimpuan, North Sumatera, Indonesian.

Phone: (+62) 634  22080  Faximili: (+62) 634 24022 e-mail: studimultidisipliner01@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.