ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI DIGITALISASI PUTUSAN PERADILAN DI DIREKTORI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA
Abstract
Many legal cases have received sharp attention from the public. Both to law enforcement officers, law enforcement institutions, and judges' decisions that are considered "not fulfilling" the values of justice for the community. Binziad Kadafi , a member of the Judicial Commission (KY). He revealed that the public has a negative perception of the integrity and inconsistency of judges' decisions. Given the importance of a decision for judges as law enforcers at the forefront, and also considering the importance of a decision as jurisprudence, and also as a form of internal and externaal supervision. The purpose of this research is the author would like to dig deeper into the implementation Digitizing Judicial Decisions in the Directory of Decisions of the Supreme Court. This type of research is classified as descriptive with a qualitative approach. The data sources for this research are judges, advocates, justice seekers and legal sources and legal literature related to this research. Furthermore, the research method used is the distribution of questionnaires to 17 judges located in 5 (five) islands in Indonesia, namely Sumatra, Java, Kalimantan, Bali and Papua. Questionnaires were also distributed to 50 advocates/community seeking justice in the Sidoarjo Religious Court area. Then the data analysis technique in this study was carried out in three stages, namely: data reduction, data interpretation and conclusion drawing and Likert Scale 4 assessment. The results of the study prove that the implementation of digitizing decisions in the Supreme Court Decision Directory is included in the "Very Good" category. with the digitization of decisions, it encourages judges to be more thorough, faster, and more efficient in making their decisions. However, there needs to be improvement efforts such as increasing server capacity and also server maintenance .
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alamsyah, Anggriani. “Perkembangan Paradigma Administrasi Publik.” Jurnal Publik Profetik 04, no. 2 (2016): 172–99.
Arissandi, D A O. “Urgensi Pidana Tambahan Pengumuman Putusan Hakim Pasca Penyelenggaraan Sistem Publikasi Putusan Melalui Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung.” Direktorat Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Muhamadiyah Malang, 2020.
Arto, Mukti. Pembaruan Hukum Islam Melalui Putusan Hakim. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.
Darwin, Muhammad, Marianne Reynelda Mamondol, Salman Alparis Sormin, Yuliana Nurhayati, Hardi Tambunan, Diana Sylvia, I Made Dwi Mertha Adnyana, Budi Prasetiyo, Pasionista Vianitati, and Antonius Adolf Gebang. Quantitative Approach Research Method. Edited by Toman Sony Tambunan. 1st ed. Bandung: CV Media Sains Indonesia, 2021.
Gibson, William. Neuromancer. New York: Berkley Publishing Group, 1989.
Gunarto, Jawade Hafidz, and Sutrisno. “Neutrality of The State Civil Apparatus in Regional Head Election Based on Justice Values.” Journal of Education and Social Science 9, no. 1 (2018): 29–37.
Hariri, Achmad, Anang Dony Irawan, and Al Qodar Purwo. “Authority Dynamic Law of Central and Regional Governments in Managing Natural Resources.” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 499 (2020): 200–208. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.286.
Komari, Komari. “Dinamisasi Dan Elastisitas Hukum Kewarisan Islam.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 1, no. 3 (2012): 463. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.3.2012.463-486.
KOMINFO. “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Dan Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 61 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik.” Jakarta: Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia, 2010.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Cetak Biru Pembaharuan Pengadian 2010-2035. 1st ed. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2010.
———. “Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia,” 2022.
———. “Keputusan Sekretaris Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 834/SEK/SK/XII/2020 Tentang Roadmap Reformasi Birokrasi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia 2020-2024.” Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2020.
———. “SK KMA RI No. 1-144 Ttg Pedoman Layanan Informasi Di Pengadilan.” Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2011.
Mansyur, Ridwan. “Information Transparency in the Court in Order to Implement Integrity Implementation and Legal Certainty.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 4, no. 1 (2015): 83–100.
Mertha Adnyana, I Made Dwi, and Ni Luh Gede Sudaryati. “The Potency of Green Education-Based Blended Learning in Biology Students at the Hindu University of Indonesia.” BIO-INOVED : Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan 4, no. 1 (2022): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.20527/bino.v4i1.11047.
Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Pekanbaru. “Peraturan Mengenai Keterbukaan Informasi Publik,” 2022.
Permana, Tri Cahya Indra. “Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dan Paradigma.” Varia Peradilan Majalah Hukum 32, no. 380 (2017).
Rusman. Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2012.
Sulistyo, Al Qodar Purwo, and Kaharudin Putra Samudra. “Peran Konstitusi Negara Dalam Mengawal Bangkitnya Kehidupan Warga Negara Pasca Wabah Virus Covid-19.” Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Keberagaman 7, no. 2 (2020): 95–102. https://doi.org/10.29303/juridiksiam.v7i2.130.
Syarifuddin, Muhammad. Transformasi Digital Persidangan Di Era New Normal: Melayani Pencari Keadilan Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. 1st ed. Jakarta: PT. Imaji Cipta Karya, 2020.
Widnyani, Ida Ayu Putu Sri. “Pergeseran Paradigma Administrasi Publik Dalam Pelayanan Publik.” SINTESA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik 8, no. 2 (2017): 93–102.
Wijayanta, Tata. “Asas Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Putusan Kepailitan Pengadilan Niaga.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 14, no. 2 (2014): 216–26. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.2.291.
Wikipedia. “Definisi Digital,” 2022.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v8i1.5736
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi diterbitkan Institut Agama Islam Negeri Padangsidimpuan Fakultas Syariah dan Ilmu Hukum
Jl. T. Rizal Nurdin KM 4,5 Sihitang Padangsidimpuan
e-mail : yprudentia@gmail.com
ISSN CETAK: 2442-6822
ISSN ONLINE: 2580-5134
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License