Difference between Auditory and Visual Students on Their Writing Achievement

Salsabila Gita Nurani

Abstract


Students’ learning styles is related to their study achievement, but what exactly the appropriate style that can influence their achievement deeply is one of the questions in recent day. This research was conducted in order to know whether there is a difference between auditory and visual learners especially in their writing achievement as the researchers argued that writing English is the most complicated skill than other English skills. Quantitative design was used in this research and the participants were selected randomly from male and female students in University of Islam Malang. They were students of English Department in fourth semester. The study found that there is no significant difference between auditory and visual students in their writing achievement. The suggestion for the next research is to consider including another learning style such as kinesthetic learners.

Keywords


auditory, visual, writing achievement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahiri, Jafar and Dunifa, La. 2015. The effect of learning strategies on higher-order thinking skills of students with different learning styles. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), [4] Issue 9.

Ahmed, Omnia. 2012. The effect of different learning styles on developing writing skills of EFl saudi learners. British Journal of Arts and Social Science. [5] 2. British Journal Publishing, Inc. Accessed on http://www.bjournal.co.uk/BJASS.aspx

Beatrice, J. A. 1994. Learning to study through critical thinking.

McGraw-Hill Higher Education. ISBN: 0256154503, 9780256154504.

Brown, H. Douglas. 2007. The principles of language teaching and learning. Boston: Pearson Education.

Dunifa, La. 2016. The effect of holistic and discrete tasks on English writing performance of students with different learning styles. International Journal of English Language Teaching [4] 9, Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK. Accessed on http://www.eajournals.org

DePorter, Bobbi and Hernacki, Mike. 2000. Quantum Learning. Bandung: Kaifa.

Dobson, Graeme. 2011. A guide to writing competency-based training materials. Melbourne: National Volunteer Skill Centre.

Gregory, G. 2005. Differentiating instruction with style: aligning teacher and learner intelligences for maximum achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Accessed on https://books.google.co.id/books?id

Hyland, Ken. 2005. Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reid. (Ed). 2002. Learning styles in ESL/EFL classroom [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Learning Press and Brook/Cole/Thomson Learning Asia.

Silverman, Linda. 2010. The visual-spatial learner. Gifter Development Center.

Sprenger, M. 2003. Differentiation through learning styles and memory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Accessed on https://books.google.co.id/books?id

Vivanco, Veronica. 2009. Holistic versus communicative approach in assessing oral production in English, Relieve [15] 2.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/ee.v13i2.17828

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


English Education: English Journal for Teaching and Learning

Publisher : Tadris Bahasa Inggris Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan 

ISSN Print : 2338-8781 ISSN Online :  2579-4043

Jl. T. Rizal Nurdin Km. 4,5 Sihitang Padangsidimpuan Sumatra Utara 22733 Indonesia

Phone: 0634-22080 Fax: 0634-24022

Email: englishjournal@uinsyahada.ac.id


Flag Counter View My Stats