Misconception identification in the buffer solutions: how to prepare the first-year student to learn general chemistry

Asih Widi Wisudawati* -  UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Fidia Lukita -  UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Sarima Saharani -  UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Alviana Mahbubah -  UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


Understanding Buffer solutions is required for university students who will take a general chemistry course. Conceptually, buffer solutions are needed to prepare chemical experiments. Due to the nature of the buffer concept, students often hold misconceptions. This study aims to analyze the misconceptions of Chemistry Education students on buffer solutions using a two-tier diagnostic test instrument. This study used a descriptive method with 43 Chemistry Education first-year students enrolled in 2025 at UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta as participants. Data collection was conducted through Google Forms using a two-tier diagnostic test consisting of 10 multiple-choice questions with explanations. The results showed that misconceptions were still significantly found, especially in the basic concepts of buffer solution properties against pH changes, the formation of buffer solution systems, the role of stoichiometry in buffer reactions, and the effect of buffer component concentration on buffer capacity. The highest percentage of misconceptions was found in the sub-concepts of buffer solution formation and loss of buffer properties. These findings indicate that some students still understand buffer solutions procedurally and absolutely, without understanding the underlying acid-base equilibrium mechanism. Therefore, learning strategies that emphasize conceptual understanding, the use of multiple representations, and the use of diagnostic tests to identify and reduce misconceptions early on are needed.


Keywords


misconceptions, buffer solutions, diagnostic test, general chemistry

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adi, Y. K., & Oktaviani, N. M. (2019). Faktor-faktor Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa SD Pada Materi Life Process and Living Things. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v1i1.7988 Alighiri, D., Drastisianti, A., &

Susilaningsih, E. (2018). Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Materi Larutan Penyangga Dalam Pembelajaran Multiple Representasi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(2), 2192–2200.

Fudhail, M. A., Jusniar, & Nursyamsyi. (2023). Analysis Of Students ’ Misconceptions in Class XI MIPA 4 Of High School 6 Makassar on Buffer Solution Using The Three Tier Diagnostic Instrument. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 12(3).

Habellia, R. C., Maria, H. T., Hidayatullah, M. M. S., & Barat, K. (2021). Pengembangan Two Tier Diagnostik Tes Untuk Mendeteksi Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA Pada Materi Gerak. Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika Dan Sains, 10(2), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.31571/saintek.v10i2.3222

Kusumaningrum, I. A., & Kristyasari, M. L. (2022). Misconceptions About Buffer Solutions. Journal of Educational Chemistry, 4(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.21580/jec.2022.4.2.12687

Nurhidayatulah, N., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018). Miskonsepsi materi larutan penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 41-51.

Rahmawati, Y. (2018). Peranan Transformative Learning dalam Pendidikan Kimia: Pengembangan Karakter, Identitas Budaya, dan Kompetensi Abad ke-21. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 8(1), 1–16.

Rokhim, D. A., Rahayu, S., & Dasna, I. W. (2023). Analisis Miskonsepsi Kimia dan Instrumen Diagnosisnya : Literatur Review. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 17(1).

Sari, K. V., & Ulianas, A. (2021). Studi Literatur Penggunaan Bahan Ajar Berorientasi Chemistry Triangle pada Materi Kimia Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 3(2), 88–94.

Stephanie, M. M., Fitriyani, D., Paristiowati, M., Moersilah, Yusmania, & Rahmawati, Y. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Menggunakan Two-Tier DiagnosticTest. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 9(2).

Theis, R., Junita, R., & Iriani, D. (2022). Diagnostic Tests Based on Three Level Tests on Fixed Materials for Students with Misconceptions. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(4), 638–646.

Treagust, D. F. (1995). Diagnostic assessment of students’ science knowledge. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 327–346). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wati, W., & Novita, D. (2021). Mereduksi Miskonsepsi Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Melalui Penerapan Strategi Predict Discuss Explain Observe Discuss Explain ( PDEODE ). Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Undiksha, 5(1), 1–10.

Wicaksana, E. J., Lukman, A., & Siburian, J. (2021). Misconception Analysis : A Necessary Complement to Investigated the Causes of Students ’ Misconception in Conducting Research and Development. Unnes Science Education Journal, 10(3), 151–159




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/lavoisier.v5i1.18684

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 asih widi wisudawati, Fidia Lukita, Sarima Saharani, Alviana Mahbubah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Journal Lavoisier: Chemistry Education Journal, The Infomation and Files Indexed by:
Flag Counter
Creative Commons License

Lavoisier:Chemistry Education Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright © 2022 Lavoisier: Chemistry Education Journal.All rights reserved.


Journal Lavoisier: Chemistry Education Journal, The Infomation and Files Supported by: