Problems of Formal Review of the TNI Law: Analysis of the Principles of Public Participation and Transparency in the Formation of Legislation
Abstract
Lawmaking is one of the fundamental instruments in realizing legal certainty and justice in national and state life. In practice, the legislative process in Indonesia still often sparks debate, both regarding substance and procedure. One of the prominent issues is the formation of the Indonesian National Army Law (UU TNI), which is being questioned due to alleged formal defects in its formulation stage. In this study, the type of research used is normative legal research or library research. The approaches used in this study are the statute approach, the conceptual approach, and the case approach. The main issue underlying the formal review of the TNI Law is the alleged failure to meet the principles of public participation and transparency in the legislative process, which has implications not only for the technical aspects of the law but also touches upon the dimensions of legitimacy and the quality of procedural democracy in Indonesia. Formal testing of the TNI Law within the framework of constitutional oversight of the legislative process certainly faced much debate. Out of the 10 cases submitted, all were rejected because the Constitutional Court found that the TNI Bill did not violate the law regarding its non-inclusion in the national legislation program, that the TNI Bill was a carryover, that the TNI Bill was in accordance with TNI reform, that the discussion of the TNI Law was transparent and accountable, that there was no limitation on document access or information access, and that the other 5 cases were still in the trial process.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alsyam, dan Yunita Sofyan. “Model Omnibus Law Dalam Penyusunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Yang Berlaku Di Indonesia.” UNES Law Review 5, no. 3 (2023): 835–46. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.423.
Aqila Shanza Ammara, Auroria Salsabila Aprialy Winardi, Putri Tiara Sari, Akbar Avatar, Eric Andhika, Amirul Fahmi Yusuf. “Sosialisasi Peranan Uji Formil Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menegakkan Keadilan Konstitusional.” Veteran Society Jpurnal 5, no. 2 (2024): 177–93.
Arif N Fuqaha, Indrianti. “Stabilitas Pemerintahan Pasca Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia antara Checks and Balances dan Demokrasi Transaksional.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (2019).
Hanafi;Damayanti; Nazulfa. “Penerapan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan” 3, no. 2 (2024): 193–210.
Hanania, Izza Difanda. “Analisis Hukum Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Proses Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal HAK Kajian Hukum Administrasi & Komunikasi 2, no. 1 (2025): 15–28. https://doi.org/10.30656/jhak.v2.i1.10312.
Hidayahningrum, Harumbi Prastya. “MK Tak Terima 5 Gugatan Uji Formil UU TNI, Pemohon Tak Sah.” Diakses 21 September 2025. https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/2893673/mk-tak-terima-5-gugatan-uji-formil-uu-tni-pemohon-tak-sah?utm.
Ilham Nur, H. Hendra Arjuna. “Peran Lembaga Legislatif dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia.” SYARIAH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 4 (2024): 279–89. http://jurnalistiqomah.org/index.php/syariah/article/view/1740%0Ahttps://jurnalistiqomah.org/index.php/syariah/article/download/1740/1418.
Konstitusi, Tim Penyusun Hukum Acara Mahkamah. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta Pusat: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2010.
“Kontras: Proses Legislasi Revisi UU TNI Tak Transparan dan Diwarnai Intimidasi | tempo.co.” Diakses 20 September 2025. https://www.tempo.co/politik/kontras-proses-legislasi-revisi-uu-tni-tak-transparan-dan-diwarnai-intimidasi-1995516?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
Latif, Abdul. Bahan ajar Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: Total Media, 2020.
Mainake, Yosephus. “Polemik Kewenangan Uji Formil di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI 13, no. 21 (2021): 1–6.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.
“MK Putuskan 5 Gugatan Uji Formil Revisi UU TNI Tidak Diterima.” Diakses 21 September 2025. https://nu.or.id/nasional/mk-putuskan-5-gugatan-uji-formil-revisi-uu-tni-tidak-diterima-IDvkj?utm.
“MK tolak uji formil UU TNI – Apa alasannya dan bagaimana dampaknya? - BBC News Indonesia.” Diakses 17 Oktober 2025. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c89devjzzejo.
Moza Dela Fudika, Ellydar Chaidir, Abdul Hadi Anshary, Heni Susanti. “Tinjaun Yuridis Pengajuan Formil Undang-Unding di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” UIR Law Review 6, no. 1 (2022): 2022. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL189%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/269107473_What_is_governance/link/548173090cf22525dcb61443/download%0Ahttp://www.econ.upf.edu/~reynal/Civil wars_12December2010.pdf%0Ahttps://think-asia.org/handle/11540/8282%0Ahttp.
Muhammad Rizki Kurniarullah, Hotmauli Silalahi, Talitha Nabila, Dewi Haryanti. “Abusive Law Making dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 34 Tahun 2004 tentang Tentara Nasional Indonesia.” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 9, no. 2 (2025).
Mulianingsih, Maulani. “Koalisi Masyarakat Sipil Ajukan Uji Formil UU TNI ke MK, Bawa 98 Bukti Awal.” Diakses 21 September 2025. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7904209/koalisi-masyarakat-sipil-ajukan-uji-formil-uu-tni-ke-mk-bawa-98-bukti-awal?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
Nugroho, Cahyo. “Politik Hukum RUU TNI/Polri: Antara Kepentingan Geopolitik dan Tekanan Masyarakat Sipil.” Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal (MIJ) 5, no. 2 (2025): 177–93. http://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/index.
“Pakar di Jogja Kritik Pengesahan UU TNI, Singgung Kemenangan Elite Politik.” Diakses 20 September 2025. https://www.detik.com/jogja/berita/d-7833327/pakar-di-jogja-kritik-pengesahan-uu-tni-singgung-kemenangan-elite-politik?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
“Revisi UU TNI Melanggar Tahapan Perencanaan dan Penyusunan Peraturan perundang-undangan - pshk.or.id.” Diakses 18 Oktober 2025. https://pshk.or.id/aktivitas/revisi-uu-tni-melanggar-tahapan-perencanaan-dan-penyusunan-peraturan-perundang-undangan/.
Rokilah. “The Role of the Regulations in Indonesia State System.” Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2020): 29–38. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v4i1.2216.
S., Maria Farida Indrati. ILMU PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN 1 Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan. Sleman: PT Kanisius, 2024.
Saifullah. Tipologi Penelitian Hukum (Sejarah, Paradigma dan Pemikiran Tokoh Indonesia). Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2018.
Soerjono Soekanto, Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2004.
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (n.d.).
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (n.d.).
UUD Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (n.d.). https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.PeraturanPIH&id=1&menu=6&status=1.
Yez Gabriel Nelwan, Josepus Julie Pinori, Harly Stanly Muaja. “Kekuatan Hukum Putusan Judical Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Perubahan Undang-Undang (Uji Materiil UU Pemilu Mengenai Batas Usia Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Putusan MK 90/PUU-XXI/2023).” Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Unsrat 15, no. 1 (2025): 1–23.
Yunita Syofyan. “Pelibatan Publik dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Mewujudkan Idealitas Kehidupan Demokrasi.” JIHHP: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik 5, no. 1 (2024): 631–38. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i1.3072.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/el-thawalib.v6i5.17390
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.









Editorial Office Board :
Kampus UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan
Jl. T Rizal Nurdin No.Km 4, RW.5, Sihitang, Padangsidimpuan Tenggara, Kota Padang Sidempuan, Sumatera Utara 22733
Jurnal El-Thawalib is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats



