The Phenomenon of Instant Interpretation on TikTok and the Risk of Reducing the Meaning of Al-Quranic Verses among the Younger Generation

Akram Akram, Arinil Hidayah Djafar, Edhy Rustan, Amrullah Harun

Abstract


The development of social media, especially TikTok, has encouraged the emergence of the phenomenon of "instant interpretation" presented through short and aesthetic videos. This phenomenon is increasingly popular among the younger generation and has the potential to influence the way they understand the Qur'an. This study aims to analyze the characteristics of instant interpretation content on TikTok and identify forms of verse misunderstandings experienced by the young generation in Palopo City. This research is a qualitative study employing a phenomenological approach to explore subjective receptive experiences. Data sources consisted of 19 informants selected through purposive sampling, including 15 active TikTok users, 2 young ustaz, and 2 academics as triangulation. Data collection techniques involved content observation, in-depth interviews, and digital documentation. Data analysis followed the Miles, Huberman, and Saldana interactive model. The results of the study show that the content of instant interpretation is dominated by aesthetic visuals that have minimal methodological references so as to produce partial and emotional understanding. The risk of misunderstanding is influenced by the format of short videos, pseudo-creator authority, TikTok algorithms, and low digital and religious literacy. The findings of this study affirm the importance of strengthening religious and digital literacy to prevent the narrowing of the meaning of verses in the digital space and contribute to the development of contemporary interpretation studies and digital da'wah

Keywords


Instant Quranic Interpretation, TikTok and the Younger Generation, The Risk of Reducing the Meaning of Verses.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, Fairuz Zakiyah, Fikry Zahria Emeraldien, Rahayu Dia Permatasari, and Vizya Hanna Zahda. “Bringing Religious Moderation Insights to ‘TikTok Da’wah.’” Jurnal Komunikasi Islam 12, no. 1 (2022): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2022.12.1.1-18.

Alanuari, Muhammad Syahrul Hasan, and Fauziyah Hamidah. “Budaya Tabligh Di Media Sosial: Nilai Spiritual Terhadap Tabligh Ustadz Hanan Attaki Di Media Instagram Pada Generasi Z Di Indonesia.” Batuthah: Jurnal Sejarah Padaban Islam 3, no. 2 (2024): 95–114. https://doi.org/10.38073/batuthah.v3i2.1760.

Awadin, Adi Pratama, and Dadan Rusmana. “Model Al-Qur ’ an and Tafsir Models : Internalization of the Development of Digital Media.” Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, Adab Dan Dakwah 5, no. 2 (2023): 221–34. https://jurnalfuad.org/index.php/ishlah/index.

Dwitama, Ilham. “Packaging Fatwa in the Post Truth Era: MUI Fatwa Contest Facing New Religious Authority.” Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Bidaya 8, no. 1 (2024): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.15575/jw.v8i1.8776.

Fadoli, Ach, and Sakinah Naziha. “Reception of the Qur ’ an on Social Media : Case Study of Qur ’ an Interpretation on the Instagram Account @ Quranreview Institut Agama Islam Nazhatut Thullab Sampang , Indonesia” VII, no. 2 (n.d.): 150–59.

Fikrianoor, Ardiyan, and Muhamad Ishaac. “Solusi Al-Qur’an Dalam Mengatasi Pengaruh Media Sosial TikTok Terhadap Keagamaan Generasi Muda.” Jurnal Keislaman 7, no. 2 (2024): 475–89. https://doi.org/10.54298/jk.v7i2.279.

Ghozali, Mahbub, Achmad Yafik Mursyid, and Nita Fitriana. “Al-Qur’an (Re)Presentation in the Short Video App Tiktok: Reading, Teaching, and Interpretive.” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 30, no. 3 (2022): 1263–82. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.3.18.

Habib, Muhammad, and Izzuddin Amin. “TAFSIR AL-MISHBAH QURAISH SHIHAB : RELEVANSI DAN KONTEKSTUALISASI AL- QUR ’ AN BAGI MASYARAKAT MODERN” 5, no. June (2025): 9–22.

Hall, S. Culture, Media, Language, Routledge the Centere for Contemporary Cultural Studies University of Birmingham, 1-38. ペインクリニック学会治療指針2, 2005.

Inaa, Inayatul Mustautina, and Saifuddin Zuhry Qudsy. “Dynamics and Typology of Quranic Content in Tiktok.” Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir 8, no. 1 (2023): 39–70. https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v8i1.3470.

Jurnal, Tanzil, and Studi Al-qur An. “FAZLUR RAHMAN ’ S TAFSIR THOUGHTS ABOUT SATAN AND EVIL State Islamic University of Salatiga , Indonesia ;” 6, no. 2 (2024): 231–46.

KOTO, NAZIA AZAHRA. “ANALISIS KONTEN DAKWAH MELALUI MEDIA SOSIAL TIK-TOK PADA AKUN @CULAPCULIP,” 2024, 2–7.

Livingstone, Sonia. “IGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy – and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood.” Journal of Children and Media 12, no. 1 (2018): 118–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2017.1417091.

Lubis, Maryam Khodimatullah, Rubino Rubino, and Elfi Yanti Ritonga. “Islamic Ethics in Tiktok Dynamics: Critical Analysis in Medan Denai District.” Journal La Sociale 5, no. 6 (2024): 1553–64. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v5i6.1423.

Lufaefi. “Telaah Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Kekerasan: Upaya Mewujudkan Perdamaian Dalam Bingkai Keindonesiaan” 16, no. 1 (2018): 1–28.

Miski, M, L F Priyandini, M R Sudawam, M A R Wardah, and A C Alim. “Hermeneutika Sebagai Metode Tafsir : Mengurai Konstruksi Pengetahuan Generasi Z Kota Malang” 3, no. 1 (2021): 55–66. https://doi.org/10.15575/kt.v3i1.11204.

Muhammad Alfito Deanoza H, Nindya Alya Ramiza U, Nasywa Annisi Lillah, and Abdul Fadhil. “Peran Dakwah Digital Dalam Menanamkan Kesadaran Beragama Bagi Remaja Generasi Z.” Jurnal Miftahul Ilmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 2, no. 1 (2025): 01–12. https://doi.org/10.59841/miftahulilmi.v2i1.31.

Mutma’innah, I’in, Agus Sutiyono, Mahfudz Junaedi, Ikhrom Ikhrom, and Umul Chairiyah. “Iconie Ftik Uin k.h. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan.” Proceeding International Conference on Islam and Education (ICONIE), 2024, 25–37. https://proceeding.uingusdur.ac.id/index.php/iconie/article/view/1688.

R., Serli, Abdul Mutakabbir, and Ependi P. “The Behavior of Tik Tok Users in Palopo City and Responses to the Qur’an.” Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an 18, no. 2 (2022): 257–82. https://doi.org/10.21009/jsq.018.2.05.

Rachmasari, Firtha Ayu, Delmarrich Bilga, Ayu Permatasari, and Stuart Hall. “Challenging Modernity : The Luntas , Modern Ludruk and Young Audiences ’ Acceptance” 3, no. 2 (2020): 139–52.

Rohman, Miftahur. “MASA DEPAN STUDI ISLAM DI PENDIDIKAN TINGGI KEAGAMAAN ISLAM ( Sebuah Tinjauan Filosofis-Yuridis )” 16, no. 2 (2018): 283–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v16i2.1200.

Silviani, Sari. “Resepsi Al- Qur ’ an Di Media Sosial ( Studi Atas Pengamalan QS . Yūsuf / 12 : 4 Di Tiktok )” 18, no. 1 (2023): 103–14. https://doi.org/10.14421/lijid.v3i2.2296.8.

Simon, Kemp. “Digital 2024: 5 Billion Social Media Users.” We Are Social, 2024. https://wearesocial.com/id/blog/2024/01/digital-2024-5-billion-social-media-users/.

Tadabbur, A L, Jurnal Ilmu, Alquran Dan, Tafsir Vol, and Stid Al-hikmah Jakarta. “Al-Musytarak Al-Lafzhy : Mendekontruksi Argumen Tafsir Tekstual 1,” no. 1 (2019): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.30868/at.v4i01.427.

Widodo, Slamet, Yuni Yulianti, and Setio Budi. “Implementasi Strategi Kppe Untuk Akselerasi Internalisasi Islam Wasathiyah Di Indonesia” 19, no. 1 (2023): 1–11.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/el-thawalib.v6i6.17970

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Jurnal El-Thawalib has Indexed by:

Free counters!

Editorial Office Board :

Kampus UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Jl. T Rizal Nurdin No.Km 4, RW.5, Sihitang, Padangsidimpuan Tenggara, Kota Padang Sidempuan, Sumatera Utara 22733 

Creative Commons License Jurnal El-Thawalib is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats