Riddah as an Obstacle to Hadhanah in the Perspective of Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah: Analysis of East Jakarta PA Decision No.1700/Pdt.G/2010/PAJT

Ali Akbar* -  UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
Jumni Nelli -  UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia

Abstract


The jurists set several conditions for those entitled to custody of children, one of which is being Muslim. Riddah (leaving Islam) is normatively seen as an obstacle to ḥaḍānah because it is feared that it can affect the child's faith and religious education. This article aims to determine the Maqasid Syariah review of the Judge's rejection of the right of Hadanah for apostate mothers as stated in the Religious Court Decision Number PA Jakarta Timur No.1700/Pdt.G/2010/PAJT. This type of research is Normative research with a Statutory approach. Primary data are the East Jakarta Religious Court Decision Number 1700/Pdt.G/2010/PAJT, as well as laws and Islamic legal provisions related to Hadanah and Riddah, while secondary legal materials are obtained from fiqh literature, books, scientific journals, and relevant scientific works. The data collection technique is documentation, and the analysis is qualitative. The results of this article show that case No. /Pdt. G/2010/2010 / PAJT did not grant Hadanah rights to apostate mothers. In this decision, the judge understood Riddah as an obstacle to Hadanah as a consideration in the Hadanah decision. As discussed in the book Kifayatul Akhyar, as a basis for understanding fiqh, it is a requirement that parents who have the obligation to educate and raise children be Muslim, so that the judge's decision rejects the plaintiff's or appellant's petition if the plaintiff or appellant is an apostate. The Panel of Judges has prioritized hifz al-ddin (dhoruriyat) and hifdz an-nafs (care for the soul) to consider the benefit and best interests of the child


Keywords


Hadhanah, Murtad, Maqashid Sharia.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu Zahra. Ushul Fiqh, Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2000, Cet. ke-6.

Agustianto Mingka,. Maqashid Syariah Dalam Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah, Jakarta: Iqtishad Publishing, 2013,

Al-Asqalani, Ibnu Hajar. Bulughul Maram dan Dalil-Dalil Hukum, alih bahasa oleh Khalifaturrahman dan Haer Haeruddin. Gema Insani, 2013.

Al-Haitami, Ibnu Hajar. Tuhfatul Muhtaj Bi Syarh Al-Minhaj, Juz VI. Maktabah At-Tijariyah Al-Kubra, 1994.

Al-Kufi, Abu Hanifah bin Nu’man bin Tsabit Al-Taimi. Al-Jami’ Al-Kabir. Daar al-Kitab al-Arabi, 1982.

Al-Syarwānī, Abd al-Hamīd. Hawāsyī Al-Syarwānī Wa Ibn Qāsim Al-‘Ubādī ‘alā Tuhfat Al-Muhtāj. Darul Kutub Ilmiyah, 2012.

al­Zuhaili, Wahbah. Fiqh al-Islam Adillatuhu. Gema Insani, 2011.

Efendi, Satria. Ushul Fiqh. cet 1. Prenada Media, 2005.

Ilyasa, Faisal Fauzan, Muhammad Nurfaizi Arya Rahardja, Akhmad Rudi Masrukhin, Mailinda Anis Zulaiha, dan Elan Sumarna. “Keutamaan Ibu dalam Hak Asuh Anak Perspektif Pendidikan: Analisis Hadits Tarbawi.” Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Agama dan Ilmu Pengetahuan 22, no. 1 (2025): 90–104. https://doi.org/10.25299/ajaip.2025.vol22(1).15850.

Kamila, Nikmatul. “PemberianKewenanganHakAsuhAnakKepadaAyahPrespektifHukumPositifdanHukumIslam.” Panitera: Journal of Law and Islamic Law 1, no. 1 (2023).

Malibari, Zainuddin bin Abdul Aziz al-. Fathul-Mu’in Bi Syarhi Quratul-’Aini. Daar al-Ma’arif, 2001.

Manna, Nibras Syafriani, Shinta Doriza, dan Maya Oktaviani. “Cerai Gugat: Telaah Penyebab Perceraian Pada Keluarga di Indonesia.” JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA 6, no. 1 (2021): 11. https://doi.org/10.36722/sh.v6i1.443.

Mumtaz Jr, Habib, Yahya Saepul Uyun, Encep Rifqi, Nurrohman Syarif, dan Usep Saepullah. “Analisa Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian Melalui Litigasi.” Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian 2, no. 7 (2023): 715–26. https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v2i7.1433.

Munawir, Ahmad Warson. Kamus Arab Indonesia. Pustaka Progresif, 1997.

Nasution, Adelina, Pagar Pagar, dan Asmuni Asmuni. “The Disparity Of Judge’s Verdict On Child Custody Decision In Aceh Sharia Court.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (2022): 890. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.12758.

Redaksi, Tim. Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Nuansa Aulia, 2009.

Rustiawan, Hafid dan Hasbullah. “Konteks Ayat Al-Qur’an dengan Pendidikan: Analisis Tafsir al-Qur’an Surah At-Tahrim Ayat 6.” Geneologi PAI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 10, no. 1 (2023): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.32678/geneologipai.v10i1.8418.

Sabiq, Sayyid. Fiqh sunnah. Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2015.

Sayyid, Sabiq. Fiqih Sunnah, Jilid 5. PT. Al-Ma’arif, 1987.

Subaini, Siti Iraini, dan Danil Putra Arisandy. “Rada’ah Perspektif Al-Qur’an Surat Al-Baqarah Ayat 233: (Sudut Pandang Ilmu Kesehatan).” Basha’ir: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 2, no. 1 (2022): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.47498/bashair.v2i1.857.

Undang-undang perkawinan No 1 Tahun 1974. Citra Umbara, 2011.

‘Uwaidah, Syakh Kamil Muhammad. Fiqh Wanita. Pustaka Al Kautsar, 2001.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/el-thawalib.v6i6.18375

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Jurnal El-Thawalib has Indexed by:

Free counters!

Editorial Office Board :

Kampus UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Jl. T Rizal Nurdin No.Km 4, RW.5, Sihitang, Padangsidimpuan Tenggara, Kota Padang Sidempuan, Sumatera Utara 22733 

Creative Commons License Jurnal El-Thawalib is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats