HPI Perspective Child Abuse Analysis
Abstract
This research is backgrounded by the crime of obscenity against minors who have not reached the age of 18 years, such as the case that occurred at Batu Rusa Beach, Tabuyung Village, Muara Batang Gadis District, Mandailing Natal Regency. The repeated obscenity of two of his stepsons, in this case, the prosecutor charged him with imprisonment for 11 years and a fine of Rp. 100,000,000, while the judge sentenced him to imprisonment for 13 years and a fine of Rp. 100,000,000. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the judges consider in imposing criminals in the decision of the Mandailing Natal District Court number 2 / Pid.Sus / 2021 / PN.Mdl, How is the review of Islamic Criminal Law against the decision of the Mandailing Natal District Court number 2 / Pid.Sus / 2021 / PN.Mdl. The purpose of this study is to find out the judge's consideration in imposing a criminal in the decision of the Mandailing Natal District Court number 2 / Pid.Sus / 2021 / PN.Mdl, This research uses a descriptive qualitative method, namely research conducted to find out and study intensively the background of circumstances, community conditions, interactions of individuals, groups, institutions, and social groups. The data collection techniques used in this study are interviews, and documentation. The results of the study stated that the judge's consideration in decision number 2/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Mdl was appropriate according to juridical and non-juridical considerations. The judge's consideration in decision number 2/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Mdl according to the Islamic Criminal Law, the punishment that has been determined by the panel of judges is in accordance with the Islamic Criminal Law, namely ta'zir which in this case is the one with regard to independence in the form of imprisonment for 13 (thirteen) years and a fine of Rp. 100,000,000.00 (one hundred million rupiah) provided that if the fine is not paid, it will be replaced by imprisonment for 6 (six) months.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
a. Sumber Buku
Djazuli, A., Fiqh Jinayah: Upaya Menanggulangi Kejahatan dalam Islam, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2000.
b. Sumber Jurnal
Ahmatnijar, “Pragmatisme Hukum Islam,” Jurnal el-Qonuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Kesyari’ahan dan Pranata Sosial 1, no. 1 2015.
Harahap, Risalan Basri,“Analisis Terhadap Putusan Mk Tentang Status Anak Di Luar Kawin,” no. 1 2012.
Harahap, Zul Anwar Ajim,”Reformulasi Tindak Pidana Zina Dalam RUU KUHP Indonesia Dan Sumbangan Hukum Islam Terhadapnya,” Yurisprudentia: Hukum Ekonomi 1, no. 1 2015.
Harahap, Zul Anwar Ajim “Azas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam,” al-Maqasid Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan-Maqasid: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan, 2, no. 1 2016.
Kurniawan, Puji, “Pandangan Hukum Progresif Dan Maslahah Mursalah Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/Puu-Viii/2010 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974” 7, No. 2 2019.
Harahap, Nurhotia, “Tindak Pidana Jual Beli Game Online Di Masa Pandemi,” Jurnal Al-Maqasid: Jurnal ilmu-ilmu kesyariahan dan keperdataan 6, no. 2 2020.
Monita, Sri Dewi Rahayu Dewi and Yulia, “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika,” PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law 1, no. 1 2021.
Mustafid, “Hukum Perbuatan Roasting Dalam Stand Up Comedy Ditinjau Berdasarkan Ketentuan Syari’at Islam” 7, No. 2 2021.
Semboda, Arip, “Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Kekerasan Pencabulan Terhadap Anak Menurut Uu No. 23 Tahun 2002 Dan Hukum Islam,” Qiyas 1, no. 23 2016.
Sirait, Adi Syahputra, “Kedudukan Dan Efektivitas Justice Collaborator Di Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana” 5 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/el-thawalib.v3i4.5946
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal El-Thawalib is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright © 2022 Jurnal El-Thawalib All rights reserved.