THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ISLAM BANKING PERFORMANCE IN TERMS OF CAMEL AND RGEC IMPLEMENTATION

Aliman Syahuri Zein

doi:10.24952/tijaroh.v7i1.3625

THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ISLAM BANKING PERFORMANCE IN TERMS OF CAMEL AND RGEC IMPLEMENTATION

Aliman Syahuri Zein (Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the comparative performance of Islamic banking in terms of the application of CAMEL and RGEC. The bank soundness indicators used for the RGEC method consist of; risk profile (NPF), earnings (ROA), capital (CAR). Meanwhile, the CAMEL method consists of; capital (CAR), assets, earnings (ROA), and liquidity (represented by FDR). Data was obtained from the official website of the OJK, www.ojk.go.id and the official website of BI, namely www.bi.go.id. The sample used was 10 years, from 2011 to 2020. The statistical test used was the paired sample t test through the SPSS application, and descriptive analysis. The results of the study concluded that in general, Islamic banking for the last 10 years was declared healthy. It's just that when viewed from the indicators of risk profile, earnings, liquidity, there are differences in the bank soundness of Islamic banking using the RGEC and CAMEL methods. As for the CAR indicator, there is no difference. The bank soundness measured used by the RGEC method is carried out using a risk-based bank rating (RBBR) approach. This assessment is a comprehensive and structured assessment of the results of the integration between risk and performance profiles which includes the implementation of good governance, profitability, and capital. So that the OJK as a supervisor can carry out appropriate and timely supervision, because the assessment is carried out comprehensively on all assessment factors and is focused on significant risks and can be immediately communicated to the bank in order to determine follow-up supervision

Keywords

Performance, Islamic Banking, CAMEL, RGEC

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahsan, M. K. (2016). Measuring Financial Performance Based on CAMEL: A Study on Selected Islamic Banks in Bangladesh. Asian Business Review, 6(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.18034/abr.v6i1.803

Edi Susilo. (2017). Analisis Pembiayaan Dan Risiko Perbankan Syariah. Pustka Pelajar UNISNUPRESS.

Ikatan Bankir Indonesia. (2016). Manajemen Kesehatan Bank Berbasis Risiko. PT Gramedia.

Khairul Umam. (2013). Manajemen Perbankan Syariah. Pustaka Setia.

Khalil, F., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance of Islamic and Conventional Banks: Evidence from Pakistan. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3397473

Ledhem, M. A., & Mekidiche, M. (2020). Economic growth and financial performance of Islamic banks: a CAMELS approach. Islamic Economic Studies, 28(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/IES-05-2020-0016

Muhammad. (2014). Manajemen Dana Bank Syariah. Rajawali Pers.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). POJK Nomor 14/SEOJK.03/2017 Tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan,

Peraturan OJK NOMOR 4 /POJK.03/2016, (2016).

Paleni, H. P., & Aprianto, R. (2019). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Pada Pt. Bpr Sindang Binaharta. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 7(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.32502/jimn.v7i2.1562

Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 6/10/PBI/2004.

Surat Edaran OJK. (2017). SAL SEOJK 14 Tingkat Kesehatan BU. 24. http://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/regulasi/surat-edaran-ojk/Pages/Surat-Edaran-Otoritas-Jasa-Keuangan-Nomor-14-SEOJK.03-2017.aspx

Tjondro, D., & Wilopo, R. (2011). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Terhadap Profitabilitas Dan Kinerja Saham Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Tercatat Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Journal of Business and Banking, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14414/jbb.v1i1.148

Undang-Undang Perbankan Syariah No.21 Tahun 2008.

Unud, E. M. (2017). Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana (Unud ), Bali. 6(2), 948–974.

Wahasusmiah, R., & Watie, K. R. (2018). Metode Rgec : Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan. I-Finance, 04(02), 170–184.

Y. Sri Susilo. Dkk. (2000). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lain. Salemba Empat.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/tijaroh.v7i1.3625